In the world of professional wrestling, the creative process behind the scenes is often shrouded in mystery. However, Cody Rhodes, a pro wrestler and son of the legendary Dusty Rhodes, has provided an insightful glimpse into the diverse approaches of some of the industry's key creative minds. In a recent podcast episode, "What Do You Wanna Talk About?", Rhodes shared his experiences and observations, offering a unique perspective on the creative geniuses shaping the wrestling world.
Creative Paths in WWE
Rhodes described the creative process as having "three paths" or approaches, each distinct and tailored to the individual's style and background. The first path, exemplified by Paul Heyman, involves drawing on past experiences and similar scenes to create new storylines. Heyman's method, according to Rhodes, is to present a vision and raise the stakes, much like Rhodes' father, Dusty, who viewed wrestling as a form of cinematic art.
The second path, as explained by Rhodes, is embodied by Michael P.S. Hayes, a longtime WWE producer. Hayes takes a long-term view, focusing on the bigger picture and the matches that are being built towards in the future. This approach ensures a cohesive and well-planned storyline, with each step carefully considered.
Then there's Bruce Prichard, who, according to Rhodes, brings a unique perspective shaped by his early career in Texas. Prichard's style is influenced by the territory where he started, adding a regional flavor to his creative contributions.
The Booking Styles of Triple H and Vince McMahon
When it comes to booking matches, Rhodes highlighted the difference between the styles of Paul "Triple H" Levesque and Vince McMahon. Rhodes noted that Levesque encourages a collaborative process, engaging in a back-and-forth with the wrestlers to refine the creative vision. This approach allows performers to have a say in the creative process, resulting in a product that feels more authentic and tailored to their strengths.
In contrast, Rhodes suggested that Vince McMahon's style might be more directive, with less room for performer input. This difference in approach is intriguing, as it showcases the varying philosophies within the WWE creative team.
The Impact of Creative Diversity
What makes this discussion particularly fascinating is the insight it provides into the diverse creative processes within the WWE. Each creative mind brings a unique perspective, shaped by their experiences and backgrounds. This diversity ensures that the WWE's creative output is rich and varied, offering something for every wrestling fan.
From the cinematic approach of Heyman and Dusty Rhodes to the long-term vision of Hayes and the regional influence of Prichard, the WWE's creative team is a melting pot of ideas. This diversity is a strength, allowing the WWE to adapt and evolve its storytelling to keep audiences engaged.
In my opinion, the WWE's success lies not just in the talent of its performers but also in the creative genius behind the scenes. The ability to draw on diverse influences and adapt to different styles is what keeps the WWE at the forefront of professional wrestling. As the industry continues to evolve, it will be fascinating to see how these creative minds continue to shape the sport.
